Related Blogs

http://diaconate-form.blogspot.com/
http://maxfrac.blogspot.com/
http://strangeloopy.blogspot.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

In Persona Christ and the Deacon

A possibly controversial assertion appears in a new book on Deacons and the Mass1. The author states “As minister of the Word, the deacon has a special responsibility for bearing the Gospel into the assembly and proclaiming the Gospel to all. In this ministry he acts ‘in persona Christi’, since it is Christ’s own Gospel, and ultimately Christ himself who proclaims that Gospel.”2 I question the applicability of this term to deacons. 

To my knowledge, the first application of the specific term “in persona Christi” to deacons in an official Church document occurs in the Code of Canon Law of 19833 (emphasis mine):  

Canon 1008: By divine institution some among the Christian faithful are constituted sacred ministers through the sacrament of orders by means of the indelible character with which they are marked; accordingly they are consecrated and deputed to shepherd the people of God, each in accord with his own grade of orders, by fulfilling in the person of Christ the head [Latin: in persona Christi Capitis] the functions of teaching, sanctifying and governing.  

Canon 1009: 1. The orders are the episcopacy, the presbyterate, and the diaconate. 2. They are conferred by an imposition of hands and by the consecratory prayer which the liturgical books prescribe for the individual grades.  

The first edition of the Catechism of the Catholic Church4 seems to follow Canon 1008:  

875: … No one can bestow grace on himself; it must be given and offered. This fact presupposes ministers of grace, authorized and empowered by Christ. From him, they receive the mission and faculty (‘the sacred power’) to act in persona Christi Capitis. The ministry in which Christ’s emissaries do and give by God’s grace what they cannot do and give by their own powers, is called a “sacrament” by the Church’s tradition. Indeed, the ministry of the Church is conferred by a special sacrament.  

However the second edition of the Catechism5 reads:  

875: … No one can bestow grace on himself; it must be given and offered. This fact presupposes ministers of grace, authorized and empowered by Christ. From him, bishops and priests receive the mission and faculty (“the sacred power”) to act in persona Christi Capitis; deacons receive the strength to serve the people of God in the diaconia of liturgy, word, and charity, in communion with the bishop and his presbyterate. The ministry in which Christ’s emissaries do and give by God’s grace what they cannot do and give by their own powers, is called a “sacrament” by the Church’s tradition. Indeed, the ministry of the Church is conferred by a special sacrament.”  

The latter expression (in the second edition of the Catechism) is more consistent with what was written by the Fathers at Vatican Council II6 than the former (in the first edition):  

28. … Priests, although they do not possess the highest degree of the priesthood, and although they are dependent on the bishops in the exercise of their power, nevertheless they are united with the bishops in sacerdotal dignity. By the power of the sacrament of Orders, in the image of Christ the eternal high Priest, they are consecrated to preach the Gospel and shepherd be faithful and to celebrate divine worship, so that they are true priests of the New Testament. Partakers of the function of Christ the sole Mediator, on their level of ministry, they announce the divine word to all. They exercise their sacred function especially in the eucharistic worship or the celebration of the Mass by which acting in the person of Christ  

29. At a lower level of the hierarchy are deacons, upon whom hands are imposed “not unto the priesthood, but unto a ministry of service”.  

If we examine the sources for Vatican Council II and of the Catechism, plus the teachings of the recent popes, before and since the Council, we find that the term “in persona Christi” finds application to the priesthood only, especially in relationship to the peak moment of the Liturgy, the words of institution within the Eucharistic Prayer:  

Pius XII7:  

40. Only to the apostles, and thenceforth to those on whom their successors have imposed hands, is granted the power of the priesthood, in virtue of which they represent the person of Jesus Christ before their people, acting at the same time as representatives of their people before God….  

68. The august sacrifice of the altar, then, is no mere empty commemoration of the passion and death of Jesus Christ, but a true and proper act of sacrifice, whereby the High Priest by an unbloody immolation offers Himself a most acceptable victim to the Eternal Father, as He did upon the cross. “It is one and the same victim; the same person now offers it by the ministry of His priests, who then offered Himself on the cross, the manner of offering alone being different.”  

69. The priest is the same, Jesus Christ, whose sacred Person His minister represents. Now the minister, by reason of the sacerdotal consecration which he has received, is made like to the High Priest and possesses the power of performing actions in virtue of Christ’s very person.  

Paul VI8:  

29. … acting in the person of Christ, the priest unites himself most intimately with the offering, and places on the altar his entire life, which bears the marks of the holocaust.  

John Paul II9:  

8. The priest offers the holy Sacrifice in persona Christi… Awareness of this reality throws a certain light on the character and significance of the priest celebrant who, by confecting the holy Sacrifice and acting “in persona Christi,” is sacramentally (and ineffably) brought into that most profound sacredness, and made part of it, spiritually linking with it in turn all those participating in the eucharistic assembly.  

Benedict XVI10 

Celebrating the Chrism Mass on Holy Thursday with the priests of Rome, Pope Benedict XVI said that priests should prepare themselves thoroughly to celebrate Mass and administer the sacraments, remembering that they act in the person of Christ. 

In light of consistent Tradition, from well before Pius XII through Vatican Council II, the definitive edition of the Catechism, and Benedict XVI, the term “in persona Christi is intrinsically identified with the priesthood (and “in persona Christi Capitis” with the episcopacy and priesthood), not the diaconate. The Code of Canon Law, which is not a theological treatise, is an outlier in this regard. Perhaps we might anticipate a future update of the Code to more definitively articulate this understanding, with changes analogous to those made in the second edition of the Catechism.  

  1. Ditewig, W. T., The Deacon at Mass, Paulist Press, 2007.
  2. Ditewig, , p. 90-91.
  3. Holy See, Code of Canon Law, 1983.
  4. Holy See, Catechism of the Catholic Church (First Edition), 1994.
  5. Holy See, Catechism of the Catholic Church (Second, “Definitive” Edition), 1997.
  6. Vatican Council II, Lumen Gentium, 1964.
  7. Pius XII, Mediator Dei, Encyclical, 1947.
  8. Paul VI, Sacredotal Caelibatus, Encyclical, 1967.
  9. John Paul II, Dominicae Cenae, Apostolic Exhoration, 1980.
  10. CWNews: Benedict XVI, “At Chrism Mass, Pope reflects on priest’s vestments” Apr. 5, 2007, http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50344

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Marital Rights

Brian Van Hoeve writes in Homiletic and Pastoral Review that Canon Law “implies” that “…married men in Major Orders are expected to abstain from the use of marriage rights after ordination.”1 I had not referred to marital rights in my original HPR article2; however, Fr. Van Hoeve’s assertion calls for investigation.

 

Van Hoeve cites an article3 by Edward Peters, to which I devote the remainder of my observations. First, I raise a minor quibble: Dr. Peters uses the term “Major Orders”. “Minor Orders” per se were suppressed by Paul VI.4 Now there are only “Orders”. More importantly, consider the pertinent Canons5 cited by Dr. Peters:

 

Canon 277, §1: Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the kingdom and therefore are bound to celibacy which is a special gift of God by which sacred ministers can adhere more easily to Christ with an undivided heart and are able to dedicate themselves more freely to the service of God and humanity.

 

Canon 1042: The following are simply impeded from receiving orders:

1 a man who has a wife, unless he is legitimately destined to the permanent diaconate…”

 

Canon 1037: An unmarried candidate for the permanent diaconate and a candidate for the presbyterate are not to be admitted to the order of diaconate unless they have assumed the obligation of celibacy in the prescribed rite publicly before God and Church or have made perpetual vows in a religious institute.

 

Dr. Peters writes: Canon “…1037 works in direct support of the two-fold clerical obligations of continence and celibacy set forth in c. 277, §1…”6 However, note that Canon 1037 mentions “celibacy” (the single state), but not “continence” itself (abstinence from intimate relations appropriate to the marital state). I suggest that Dr. Peter’s interpretation, “the possibility that clerics in the Western Church, including married permanent deacons, are bound … to observed continence”, is illogical and, therefore, non-canonical.

 

The relevant logical content (although not the total meaning) of Canon 277 §1 can be reduced to: “The obligation of continence implies the obligation of celibacy”. In logical, symbolic terms, let “the obligation of continence” be “A”, and “the obligation of celibacy” be “B”. Let “implies” be “É”. The logical content of the canon is then expressed as “A É B”.

 

“A É B” is logically equivalent to “~B É ~A”, in which “~B” means “celibacy is not obligatory” and “~A” means “continence is not obligatory”. Thus, if celibacy is not required (as implied for married candidates to the diaconate in Canon 1042), neither is continence, within the logical context of the statement. Q.E.D. In other words, Dr. Peters’ interpretation is invalid.

 

Of course, marriage has its own moral, as well as canonical, obligations: the “non-obligation” of continence is confined to the marital bond. In the present context, permanent deacons are morally obliged to observe chastity according to their state of life. For married deacons, marriage rights are reserved to the spouses with continence outside of the marital bond, while unmarried deacons are obligated to celibacy and continence in all relationships.
 

  1. Van Hove, B., No use of marriage rights after ordination, HPR, April, 2007, v. CVIII, No. 7, p. 6.
  2. Pilger, R. H., Jr., The ministry of the deacon, HPR, Nov., 2006, v. CVIII, no. 11, p. 23-27.
  3. Peters, E. N., Canonical considerations on diaconal continence, Studia Canonica, v. 39/1-2 (2005), p. 147-180.
  4. PP Paul VI, Ministerica Quaedam, Apostolic Letter given Motu Proprio: On first tonsure, minor orders, and the subdiaconate, Rome, August 15, 1972.
  5. Holy See, Code of Canon Law, 1983.
  6. Peters, p. 152.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Clerical Attire

The deacon is to be the visible, sacramental sign of Christ the Servant. In my article in Homiletics and Pastoral Review1 I noted that many bishops discourage clerical attire for deacons, and even where permitted, many deacons decline to wear clerics. In letter discussing my article2 Deacon J. S. Shea agrees that there is a need for distinctive attire of the deacon when he is ministering in the name of the Church. Deacon Shea suggests the Cross of St. Lawrence might be the appropriate visible symbol for ministering deacons. In my archdiocese deacons are encouraged to wear the Cross of St. Lawrence along with clerical attire whenever we formally minister (visiting hospitals, prisons, catechizing, etc.). In this way, deacons are more clearly distinguished from priests, although some education usually is required. 

 

  1. Pilger, R. H., Jr., The ministry of the deacon, HPR, Nov., 2006, v. CVIII, no. 11, p. 23-27.
  2. Shea, J. S., Identity of the deacon (letter), HPR, March, 2007, v. CVIII, No. 6, p. 5, 79.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Ordinary Radical”

My comment on an OpinionJournal piece: link.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Latest effort

At my wife’s urging, and based on the results of my annual checkup, it’s time to work on my weight. So, I’m trying a couple of approaches: South Beach and SlimBody Coach. We’ll see what progress can be made (as ArvadaDad).
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mystery of the Beloved Disciple: Links

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CHAPTER 15 — CONCLUSION

The preceding chapters represent an attempt to convey one consistent theme that has been repeatedly impressed upon our minds and hearts: Jesus gives to each person the invitation to eternal life with him, his Father, and the Holy Spirit. This eternal life begins now, and is a deeper invitation to intimate relationship with the God of all creation. This theme permeates Sacred Scripture and is central to the Gospel message. To the person who responds to this invitation, there naturally arises two questions, "What must I do to share in eternal life, to come to know the Father and his Son?" and "How can I extend this invitation to others?" The Church at Vatican II answered these questions by reminding us: 

"The Church’s, mission is concerned with the salvation of men; and men win salvation through the grace of Christ and faith in him. The apostolate of the Church therefore, and of each of is members, aims primarily at announcing to the world by word and action the message of Christ and communicating to it the grace of Christ. The principal means of bringing this about is the ministry of the word and of the sacraments" (Vatican II, Decree on the Apostolate of the Lay People, 11.6).

The fruitfulness of the Church’s apostolate, depends on the union of the individual person with Jesus; in fact both questions are intimately tied together: 

"Christ, sent by the Father, is the source of the Church’s whole apostolate. Clearly then, the fruitfulness of the apostolate of lay people depends on their living union with Christ; as the Lord said himself; ‘Whoever dwells in me and I in him, bears much fruit, for separated from me you can do nothing.’ This life of intimate union with Christ is maintained by the spiritual helps common to all the faithful, chiefly by active participation in the liturgy" (Vat II, I.4). 

In addition to the liturgy, these include: performance of everyday tasks, advancing "fervently, joyfully, overcoming difficulties with prudent patient efforts"; continuous exercise of faith, hope, and charity; meditation on the Word of God and use of the light of faith; endurance of persecution; and by having genuine devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. Implicit in all of this is the need for prayer, for prayer permeates the life of the committed Christian. Prayer, all kinds of prayer, is the key to relationship with Jesus; prayer that then leads to action – what Vatican II calls the Apostolate. Prayer is essential, yet prayer is not really fruitful prayer unless it is reflected in action.

 

When Jesus walked among us, people saw no hesitation about approaching him. Some touched his garment, others asked only for his word, still others received the touch of his hand; all who asked received what they asked for; healing, deliverance, forgiveness, salvation. For his disciples the question was, "[W]here do you stay?"

 

Now Jesus no longer walks the earth; he sits at the right hand of the Father. Does this mean that it is no longer possible to approach him, that he is somehow distant and unconcerned with his people? The solution to the mystery of the beloved disciple, to cite but one example from the preceding chapters, provides a resounding answer: No! He sent the Holy Spirit, to be with us, to prompt our inner prayer and to approach him with every need and desire. We who have been baptized, even more especially, we who have also been confirmed, have acknowledged Jesus as our Lord and Savior. With this acknowledgement of faith in our hearts, comes the ability and responsibility to exercise the gifts of the Holy Spirit which came with baptism and confirmation.

 

One of the greatest gifts we have received through the Spirit is that of faith, which we exercise in prayer — the ability to approach Jesus just the way the people of his time did. To them he was a very special, gifted person who cared about us and has the power to change our lives. We cannot approach him face-to-face literally, but we can have the same confidence that he hears our prayer. In fact, Jesus told his disciples that they (and we!) would perform greater signs than he did. How? By Jesus going to the Father with our request, when we make it.

 

Jesus wants his followers – us – to come to him, spend time with him, to listen, to learn, to be healed, and to make our requests of him. He wants us to intercede for one another, that all might receive healing and salvation. The immensity of the problems of the world and just the problems in our own lives often seem overwhelming, and we are tempted to throw up our hands in despair. However, Jesus has already performed the final saving task by his sacrifice on the Cross. It is not for us to save the world single-handed, so we can relax; the whole of even our own problems is not all on our own backs. What Jesus calls us to do is offer him our lives, so he can give us new life. We are called to give our time, our treasure, and, lastly, our spiritual treasure – the ability to pray. If we desire union with Jesus and to carry his good news to our part of the world, prayer is the only way. It is this last call that is so important: Pray always in the Spirit, for everyone in the holy company. Pray always that the word of God will be on the lips of those who proclaim it. Pray for the healing of the sick. Pray for deliverance from the evil one. Pray for the poor and the hungry. Pray that each one of us comes closer to our Lord Jesus, to know the great riches of his glory: 

"That is why I kneel before the Father from whom every family in heaven and on earth takes its name; and I pray that he will bestow on you gifts in keeping with the riches of his glory. May he strengthen you inwardly through the working of his Spirit. May Christ dwell in your hearts through faith, and may charity be the root and foundation of your life. Thus you will be able to grasp fully, with all the holy ones, the breadth and length and height and depth of Christ’s love, and experience this love which surpasses all knowledge, so that you may attain to the fullness of God himself. To him whose power now at work in us can do immeasurably more than we ask or imagine – to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus through all generations, world without end. Amen" (Eph 3:14-21).

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

The following books and other works by the same authors have in varying degrees influenced many of the ideas presented in this book. They are included as both sources and as suggestions for further reading.

 

Brown, R. E., The Community of the Beloved Disciple, Paulist Press, New York, 1979.

Doherty, Catherine de Hueck, Poustinia, Ave Maria Press, Notre Dame, Ind. , 1975.

Hinnesbusch, Paul, ed., Contemplation and the Charismatic Renewal, Paulist Press, New York, 1986.

Kelsey, Morton, The Other Side of Silence, Paulist Press, New York, 1976.

Linn, Dennis, and Linn, Matthew, Healing Life’s. Hurts, Paulist Press, New York, 1978.

Sanford, John A., The Kingdom Within, Paulist Press, 1970.

Scanlan, Michael, and Shields, Ann Therese, And Their Eyes Were Opened, Servant, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1976.

Smith, Herbert F., The Pilgrim Contemplative, Books One and Two, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minn., 1977.

Wild, Robert A., The Post-Charismatic Experience, Living Flame Press, Locust Valley, NY, 1984.

 

Introduction

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CHAPTER 14 — HEALING AND WHOLENESS

The call to intimacy with God is also the call to healing and wholeness. For many Christians, the initial contact with Jesus, the first experience of his person, and the beginning of an intimate relationship with him comes through healing. The healing may be physical, psychological, or spiritual, but the recipient of the healing suddenly knows that he or she has been touched by the divine person. The witness of the Church in Scripture and Tradition affirms that Jesus came to bring wholeness to humanity: 

"The spirit of the LORD is upon me; therefore he has anointed me. He has sent me to bring glad tidings to the poor, to proclaim liberty to captives, Recovery of sight to the blind and release to prisoners, To announce a year of favor from the Lord" (Lk 4:18-19, quoting from Is 61:1-2).  

And, in that wholeness, Jesus brings the individual and the whole Church into reconciliation and relationship with God the Father. Sign after sign, miracle after miracle, Jesus brought healing to the Jews and even a few gentiles. We can confidently assert, then, that Jesus wants his people healed, whole, and holy. In order to receive the healing and wholeness, we need to consider the ways in which we need healing and the ways in which we are broken. Even if we are physically well, we still need to be healed.

Why are we broken, hurtling, sick, and crippled? First, there is the existence of original sin, the sin of the first man and woman. We have responded to the sins of others in a sinful way ourselves, even before the age of reason. We allowed sin to take root in our soul even before birth, from conception on: 

"Indeed, in guilt was I born, and in sin my mother conceived me" (Ps 51:7). 

The Church recognizes that we are not responsible for sinful actions and attitudes before age seven or eight, but those attitudes have, nevertheless, taken root — perhaps this is the psychological component of original sin. Prayerful reflection often shows that we hold our parents responsible for their hurtful actions against us while we were still young children. Some argue that even the child in the womb responds to the negative emotions of the mother, particularly in the case of a surprise pregnancy, sickness, or emotional

stress. This emotional pain is often carried into adulthood, hidden deep within the recesses of the "heart". Jesus can heal these hurts and pains, unpleasant and hidden memories.

 

Parts of the adult person still behave in an infantile way, because of the unhealed hurt. How often do we overreact to some outward stimulus because it opens an unhealed wound, something we haven’t dealt with? Indeed, we often react, rather than act. Jesus can restore our abilities to act as free persons, no longer imprisoned by the pain of the past.

 

We have often inherited generational attitudes and genetic flaws, the former in subtle ways, involving prejudice, compulsions, "right manners", and ignorance. However, the "sins of the fathers" no longer need be visited on the sons and daughters; Jesus’ cross can come between and sever the link.

 

If God wants me healed, will he heal me? Can we find any instance in the Gospels in which Jesus said no to a request for healing? Only in Nazareth, his home, did he refuse to perform such miracles, so distressed was he at the lack of faith there. The witness of Scripture demonstrates that he did heal the physically, mentally, and spiritually ill; he freed the oppressed from the grip of the evil one, and restored the dead to life.

 

The Church has always recognized the power of God to heal. Miracles at Lourdes are often accepted as worthy of private belief by the faithful, and miraculous cures often attest to the sanctity of Saints. The Church believes that Jesus heals. We can believe that the prayer of faith always results in healing, even if we cannot see it. Jesus knows what we need, as his Spirit makes intercession for us,

 

What must we do in order to be healed? In order to receive God’s gift of healing it is necessary, with God’s help, to overcome attitudes which hinder healing. In fact the very achievement of these steps is healing in itself.

 

It is essential that we recognize our own responsibility for our own individual sin. As. an adult, as a Christian growing towards maturity, it is not longer acceptable to  

"talk like a child, think like a child, reason like a child. When I became a man I put childish ways aside" (1 Cor 13:11).  

As we begin to see ourselves as we really are; sinful, broken, fragmented, we recognize the need for healing, the need for more than we can do by ourselves. For,  

"There is no just man, not even one" (Rom 3:10).  

In the struggle to live the Christian life, the individual disciple eventually encounters the truth that Paul expressed: 

"I know that no good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; the desire to do right is there but- not the power. What happens is that I do, not the good I will to do, but the evil I do not intend" (Rom 7:18-19). 

We need to recognize both responsibility and powerlessness. Like the perpetual dieter who loses twenty pounds by exercise of willpower and the pounds soon return, so it is with attempts to be a "good person" solely under our own power; failures inevitably occur. In our humanness it is almost as if we need to fail before we can accept our inability to succeed; we do not seem to be able to see the truth about ourselves before we experience it.

 

In order to be healed we need to believe that we are ‘truly "good enough" in the eyes of God and his people to be healed. Perhaps, this is for many Christians even harder to accept than responsibility and powerlessness, particularly the poor, victims of child abuse, and the physically handicapped. Yet, Jesus, particularly as recorded in the Gospel according to Matthew, repeatedly emphasized the unique value of each person: The poor in spirit possess the kingdom; the sorrowing are to be consoled; the lowly will inherit the land; the persecuted can anticipate the great reward in heaven (Mat 5:3-6;12). The individual disciple and believer is the salt of the earth and the light of the world (Mat 5:13,14). The Father promises to feed and clothe his children, to dress them in splendor (Mat 6:26-34). Perhaps the greatest affirmation is hinted at in two short parables: 

"The reign of God is like a buried treasure which a man found in a field. He hid it again, and rejoicing at his find went and sold all he had and bought that field. Or again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant’s search for fine pearls. When he found one really valuable pearl, he went back and put up for sale all that he had and bought it" (Mat 13:44-46). 

The conventional and certainly primary interpretation of the parables is for the individual to spiritually sell all he or she has, to put aside all for the kingdom of God; the reign of God is worth leaving all behind, letting the dead bury their dead, trusting in God to provide a place for the Son of Man and his disciples to lay their heads (to cite other of Jesus’ sayings). Yet, after all, Jesus, himself gave all he had, to the point of great suffering, crucifixion, and death for…for what? Jesus gave all, sold everything for the Church, for the individual believer, for us. Are we the treasure, the pearl? Are we worth so much that Jesus died for us? The God of the universe gave his only Son for each person, for us. We are worthy of salvation and worthy of his healing. We are worthy of intimate relationship with him. God the Father gave all he had – all his creation – to humanity; then, in the fullness of time he gave his Son. The believer is worthy of being healed and worthy of intimate relationship with God – Jesus made each believer worthy. Belief in worthiness is accompanied by belief in God’s love for the individual. All of the Gospel can be read as a romance, a book of the love of God for his people. In John’s Gospel, the Gospel of the beloved disciple, verse after verse proclaims the love of Christ and the Father for the church: 

"Yes, God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him may not die but may have eternal life" (Jn 3:16).  

In order to receive God’s love we are to love him as well: 

"He who loves me will be loved by my Father. I too will love him and reveal myself to him… Anyone who loves, me will be true to lay word and my Father will love him; we will come to him and make our dwelling place with him" ( Jn 14:21,23).

 

"See what love the Father has bestowed on us in letting us be called children of God!" (1 Jn 3:1).

 

"Love, then, consists in this; not that we have loved God but that he has loved us and has sent his Son as an offering for our sins" (1 Jn 4:10). 

In order to be healed, we must be willing to face the truth about ourselves and the truth about God. Above all, we need to recognize our need for healing, to avoid the trap of the Pharisee: 

"If you were born blind there would be no sin in that. ‘But we see,’ you say, and your sin remains" (Jn 9:41).  

Perhaps the greatest manifestation of our blindness to our own sinfulness, weakness, brokenness is our unwillingness, or worse, seeming inability to forgive. Jesus warns us bluntly of the need to forgive. The "Our Father", the Lord’s Prayer, cannot be prayed honestly unless we forgive those who wrong us.  

"If you forgive the faults of others, your heavenly Father will forgive you yours. If you do not forgive others, neither will your Father forgive you" (Mat 6:l4-15).  

Forgiveness does come with a price, for justice must be fulfilled. When a neighbor wrongs us, justice requires punishment. If I forgive by my own power, I am taking the

punishment on myself. This is what happened at the cross. By our sinfulness, we have wronged God and neighbor, but, above all, God.

 

Justice is the old covenant., the Law of Moses, demanded payment; "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" (Ex 21:24). Yet, Jesus, by going to the cross, accepted the judgment, of the Law; he, as God and man,  

"was pierced for our offenses, crushed for our sins, Upon him was the chastisement, that makes us whole; by his stripes we were healed. We had all gone astray like sheep, each following his own way; But the LORD laid upon him the guilt of us all" (Is 53:6-7). 

In forgiving our neighbor, we take on the punishment ourselves, yet, sometimes, ‘though we know the need of forgiveness, it is more than seems humanly possible. However, the key to receiving the healing that comes by forgiving is recognition that by his sacrifice, Jesus gives each believer the power to forgive. After all, the sin of the neighbor against us is also a sin against God, and Jesus accepted all our offenses and our neighbor’s offense, Jesus takes, on our neighbor’s chastisement just as he takes on our own. So, when we forgive, in the name of Jesus, he bears the brunt of the judgment, not we: "By his stripes we were healed."

 

Summoning all the strength we have, we choose to forgive. We tell Jesus of our choice. Then we ask for his strength, his power to forgive; we allow ourselves to relive the pain, knowing that Jesus is there with us. Sometimes, for the deep hurt, the presence of Jesus, in our brothers and sisters in the faith is necessary – their love, Jesus’s love, through them, giving the strength to forgive.

 

Truly, one of the great gifts of the Spirit is the power to forgive another’s transgressions. This is part of the truth that sets us free. For when we fail to forgive, the sin against us remains and takes root. Bitterness grows, perhaps unconsciously, and imprisons us in our own sinfulness. The offender, by his or her hurtfulness and by our own unforgiveness, has us in his or her power, yet he or she may not even know it! We are not free; our bitterness entraps us into a slavery to unforgiveness, becoming sin. Indeed, 

"What a wretched man I am! Who can free me from this body under the power of death?" (Rom 7:24-25).  

Unforgiveness is death; it is slavery; it imprisons mind and body; it is the root of so much disease. When the believer forgives, in the name of Jesus, no person has power over his or her spirit. The forgiving and forgiven Christian is free.

 

In the need for forgiveness, one needs not only to include family and neighbor, one also needs to include self. Paul writes, 

"Husbands should love their wives as they do their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself" (Eph 5:28).  

We are called to love ourselves, because God loves us – he created us, and he loves us in spite of all our sin, our weakness, our brokenness. And, the more we learn about ourselves, we may even discover that we need to forgive God, himself. Not for what he did, for we do believe in his omnipotence, that indeed  

"God makes all things work together for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his decree" (Rom. 8:28), 

but for those things our childish self "thinks" he has done. Our sinfulness and ignorance can lead us to holding God responsible for our hurt, our pain, the life we live. As a

step towards taking responsibility for our own lives, we need to forgive God and ask his forgiveness as well.

 

For the Christian, unforgiveness is in itself sinful. So, in addition to forgiving "those who have hurt- us, we need to also ask God’s forgiveness for our own bitterness. In a superficial examination of the Gospels, we might conclude that Jesus healed only those who had an obvious need for healing. Yet, the experience of Christians, growing in mature love of God, commonly produces recognition of whole areas of their lives which have been scarred by hurts, particularly hurts of the heart. The encounter of the person with unloving attitudes hurts, at any age, not just in childhood. The pain in childhood, however, is probably all the more shattering, since the child lacks the power to defend or forgive. And the hurt child remains within the mature adult, waiting for the healing love for which he or she was left wanting. This need for healing manifests itself in so many ways; often it becomes more obvious the closer one draws to God. That which was in darkness is revealed in the light.

 

In what ways does the need for healing manifest itself? Many physical illnesses may be rooted in childhood hurts. Many others, though, may lack any connection between personal hurts and sinfulness, as with the man born blind: 

"It was no sin, either of this man or of his parents" (Jn 9:1). 

Psychological problems may in many cases be rooted in childhood hurts and in sinful attitudes. Other psychological problems may still be of genetic or physical origin.

Sinful patterns and attitudes are often rooted in brokenness and unforgiveness. The importance of the relationship of parent to child is difficult to underestimate. Inadequate love for a child can later lead to overeating, promiscuity, alcoholism, excessive pursuit of worldly success, and so on.

 

Haunting memories of unpleasant events in one’s past indicate a need for healing. Even for the person with a "relatively happy" childhood, the pain of adolescence, in particular, often leaves many unhealed wounds. The inability to forgive, particularly one kind of hurt, usually is rooted in a deeper unpleasant memory. Often our seemingly "good" behavior is rooted in sinful compulsions. We act in a particular way out of fear, out of what others might think; we do not act out of love. Just because we appear "virtuous" in the eyes of the world does not mean a virtuous soul is present.

 

Undesirable, unhealthy habits often mask a need for healing. Overeating and smoking are obvious examples. Awareness of the need for healing and the need itself are two different things. So often, in our lives we identify something about ourselves or others we do not like. We want that something to change, as it causes us pain. We desire some form of healing. As we get closer and closer to God, responding to his call to intimacy, however, we become uncomfortably aware that our need for healing may be very different from what we originally thought. We become more aware of the truth about ourselves; we still see indistinctly, like a First Century mirror (1 Cor 13:12), but the mirror has been polished somewhat. What needs to be changed in us may be not so much an overweight body as it is the lack of trust in God which translates itself into gluttony, showing forth itself in rotund revelation. We need to go on a diet, yes, but what kind of diet?

 

How much of our misery is attributable to others? To what extent is that man, this woman, that employer, this parish, responsible for our pain? We are not appreciated, loved, or nourished by our community; a pox on them all! Lord, heal THEM, change THEM, get rid of THEM!

 

In order for change to occur, in order for us to overcome our pain and anxiety, we must acknowledge that we have lost the way. We must be willing to come face to face with the truth. We need to admit that our lives have not truly been the lives we were created to live. Before we can expect to be healed, we must acknowledge Jesus, for he is the way, the truth, and the life.

 

Heal us, Lord Jesus, for we acknowledge your Lordship. We want you to be Lord of our lives. We acknowledge that you are one with the Father, the creator of all. We believe that by your passion and your death on the cross you took our place, that you paid the total price for our disobedience, our sinfulness, our disregard for the laws of creation, our lack of love for you, the Father, and our brothers and sisters. By your glorious resurrection, we believe you also raised us up to new life, eternal life, intimate life, with you and the Father. Hear us, Lord Jesus; heal us, Lord

 

Jesus, Send anew your Spirit, upon us, enliven the Spirit within us which we received at. Baptism and Confirmation. Thank you, Jesus, for the opportunity to call upon you, and use your name. Amen, Alleluia.

 

The commitment to Jesus, God and man, opens the door to healing and intimate relationship, for commitment involves trust, in him, that, in responding to his call, we can let, go of the pain, the unforgiveness, the shame, the bitterness within – anything blocking the flow of his Spirit. In prayer, through meditation on Scripture, we come into his presence, to hear his word. In the sacraments, he nourishes and heals us, bringing us ever more deeply into his mystical body, the Church. We can trust him and be honest with him.

 

In his body we can find other Christians, brothers and sisters with whom we can find trust and honesty. We can find people who will love us just the way we are, who allow him to love us through them. For they, too, acknowledge their sinfulness; they know where we are and where we, are coming from. We can hear their witness, share their sorrows, rejoice in their healings, and their triumphs. We can be healed in just listening to them; healing is contagious. We can make the healing real; it can be claimed, in spite of doubts. The power of the Spirit will not only heal, it will give us the power to claim the healing. The power of forgiveness will flow; we may not be able to forgive, but the Jesus within us will give us the power to forgive.

 

We make the healing real. We write about it, draw it, proclaim it. Let the crutches of our inferiority, the braces of our bitterness hang over the mantle, signs of lack of dependence on human power and symbols of the love we experience in Jesus.

 

We seal the new gift of healing with the sacraments. We celebrate forgiveness by confessing our sinfulness and brokenness; we glory in thanksgiving to our God, in union with all his people in Eucharist. We claim our freedom as royalty, as sons and daughters of the Father, as a sisters and brothers of the King; the fruit of the promises made at baptism. We validate the commitment made at confirmation.

 

We are healed people, becoming more healed every day. We are whole people, becoming more whole with each passing hour. We are holy people, set apart by God, called even before we were born, to be unique, one out of many, child of God, made in his image and likeness, called to intimate relationship with him.

 

CHAPTER 15

 

Introduction

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CHAPTER 13 — EUCHARIST

"This is my body…This is my blood…"

Central to the faith and worship of Roman Catholics and many other Christians is the celebration of the Lord’s Supper, the Eucharist. To Catholics, Eucharist is the Most Blessed Sacrament, and indeed it should be central to the spirituality of each Catholic Christian. Eucharist is largely viewed in its communal context, as the culmination of the Church’s worship of God the Father, through his Son, Jesus, in the power of the Holy Spirit, Eucharist means prayers of praise and thanksgiving to the Father.

 

The meaning of Eucharist to the Church and the individual cannot be exhausted. There are, nevertheless, aspects of Eucharist which clearly deserve discussion in any consideration of the intimate relationship to which God calls each person. Like matrimony, Eucharist finds profound meaning as a sacrament when the verse from the Fourth Gospel is recalled: 

"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us" (Jn 1:14). 

The full meaning of the sacrament is inseparable from the Incarnation. When we truly believe that the bread is his body and the wine is his blood, then  

"we have seen his glory; the glory of an only Son coming from the Father, filled with enduring love" (1 Jn 1:14);

 

"This is what we proclaim to you; what was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked upon and our hands have touched – we speak of the word of life" (1 Jn 1);

 

"This is how you can recognize God’s Spirit: every spirit that acknowledges Jesus Christ come in the flesh belongs to God" (1 Jn 4:2).

 

In many of Jesus’ signs and miracles, Eucharist plays a critical role. In his first sign, at Cana, in the miracle of water made wine, he connects the idea of Eucharist with matrimony as indicative of the future wedding of Christ with his bride, the Church (see also Mt 22:1-14 and Rev 19;6-S). That there is more wine — the choice wine at that — than can possibly be consumed at the Cana wedding celebration no doubt foreshadows the abundance of mercy provided by the blood which flowed from his side on the Cross (Jn 19-34): 

"[T]his is my blood, the blood of the covenant, to be poured ‘out in behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins." (Mt 26:28).

In the miracles of the multiplication of loaves, the abundance of food foreshadows the abundant life of the kingdom: 

"I myself am the bread of life. No one who comes to me shall ever be hungry, no one who believes in me shall ever thirst" (Jn 6:35). 

It is clear, however, that one can receive the body and blood of Jesus, and go unfed, remain unfilled. There is first the necessity of being prepared to recognize Jesus and his body, and then act on that recognition. As Paul wrote,  

"He who eats and drinks without recognizing the body eats and drinks a judgment upon himself" (1 Cor 11:29). 

Recognition of Jesus and his body means recognizing Jesus in his body, the Church, and, in fact, recognizing him in each person, Christian or not: 

"Is not the cup of blessing we bless a sharing in the blood of Christ-? And is not the bread we break a sharing in the body of Christ? Because the loaf of bread is one, we, many though we are, are one body, for we all partake of "the one loaf" (1 Cor 10:16-17). 

This may be part of the meaning contained in the encounter on the road to Emmaus: 

"Two of them that same day were making their way to a village named Emmaus seven miles distant from Jerusalem, discussing as they went all that had happened. In the course of their lively exchange, Jesus approached and began to walk along with them. However, they were restrained from recognizing him. He said to them, ‘What are you discussing as you go your way?’ They halted, in distress, and one of them, Cleopas by name, asked him, ‘Are you the only resident of Jerusalem who does not know the things that went on there these past few days?’ He said to them, ‘What things?’ They said; ‘All those that had to do with Jesus of Nazareth, a prophet powerful in word and deed in the eyes of God and all the people; how our chief priests and leaders delivered him up to be condemned to death, and crucified him. We were hoping that he was the one who would set Israel free. Besides all this, today, the third day since these things happened, some women of our group have just brought us some astonishing news. They were at the tomb before dawn and failed to find his body, but returned with the tale that they had seen a vision of angels who declared he was alive. Some of our number went to the tomb and found it to be just as the women said, but him they did not see.’ "Then he said to them, ‘What’ little sense you have! How slow you are to believe all that the prophets have announced! Did not the Messiah have to undergo all this so as to enter into his glory?’ Beginning, then, with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted for them every passage of Scripture which referred to him. By now they were near the village to which they were going, and he acted as if he were going farther. But they pressed him: ‘Stay with us. It is nearly evening — the day is practically over,’ So he went in to stay with them. "When he had seated himself with them to eat, he took bread, pronounced the blessing, then broke the bread and began to distribute it to them. With that their eyes were opened and they recognized him; whereupon he vanished from their sight. They said to one another, ‘Were not our hearts burning inside us as he talked to us on the road and explained the Scriptures to us?’ They go up immediately and returned to Jerusalem, where they found the Eleven and the rest of the company assembled. They were greeted with, ‘The Lord has been raised! It is true! He has appeared to Simon.’ Then they recounted what had happened on the road and how they had come to know him in the breaking of the bread" (Lk 24:3-35). 

Despite the witness of the women who saw angels near the empty tomb, angels who told them that Jesus was risen, two disciples still departed Jerusalem. We can only imagine their pain and confusion as they expressed their distress at the stranger who joined them on the roa, at his seeming ignorance of all of the events, surrounding their master’s death. As they walked farther from the city, the stranger – Jesus, unrecognized – begins to open their minds to all in the Law and Prophets which prophesied the Passion. Still, even with hearts burning within them, they did not recognize the stranger. It was not until they invited him to eat, and he broke the bread, that they recognized him. As a result of the revelation, the two quickly returned to Jerusalem – we can imagine they ran all the way – to report what they had seen to the rest of the disciples.

 

Consider what occurred on the road to Emmaus; despite their distress, the two disciples shared their witness with a stranger. They invited him to stay with them. They responded, almost instinctively, to the prophecy of Malachi, by not turning aside a stranger (Mal 3:5). Perhaps they were recognizing Jesus unconsciously. Nevertheless, when Jesus revealed himself in the breaking of the bread, their response was to return immediately to the rest of the disciples. The Eucharist became the channel of recognition, and Eucharist united the disciples once again.  

"Return to me, and I will return to you, says the LORD of hosts" (Mal 3:7). 

Just as the wedding alone isn’t the totality of the sacrament of matrimony, so Eucharist as sacrament isn’t limited to the Mass and Communion. When we do it for the least of the brothers, we do it for the king – Jesus – and that is a fulfillment of Eucharist. When we live the Gospel, we live Eucharist. The two disciples ran back to Jerusalem to share their good news, a consequence of Eucharist.

 

There is in Eucharist, then, a very powerful and different kind of intimacy with God. It- is an intimacy with his people, sharing our goods, our talents, or love, even our pain, indeed our very selves. We become part of Eucharist ourselves, for we are part of the body. The Church emphasizes this when the offertory prayer refers to the work of human hands. When we adore the Eucharist, we see not only Jesus and his resurrected body, we see his glorified body the Church; we see ourselves. We become the living sacrifice in the praise we offer him: 

"For from the rising of the sun, even to its setting, my same is great among the nations; And everywhere they bring sacrifice to my name, and a pure offering; For great is my name among the nations, says the LORD of hosts" (Mal 1:11).  

When Jesus says, through the priest, "This is my body", he is also talking about us, for we can unite ourselves with his body, and give ourselves up for all our brothers and sisters. We can share in his passion, his death, his resurrection; we, too, can run back to Jerusalem to bring the good news – the master lives and we live also for we have recognized him and ourselves, in the breaking of the bread.

 

CHAPTER 14

 

Introduction

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment